Encouraging walking and cycling: Success stories - Introduction
Case Study 1 - Finsbury Park Partnership
|
Partners |
Boroughs of Islington, Hackney and Haringey, London Development Agency, Transport for London, Greater London Assembly, transport operators, police forces |
|---|---|
|
Region |
London |
|
Type of scheme |
Area-wide urban regeneration |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents, local business, visitors from other parts of London |
|
Sectors |
Transport, communities, business, land use planning, crime |
|
Description |
The Finsbury Park Partnership was formed to manage a seven-year, £25 million, Single Regeneration Budget programme following a bid by community organisations, businesses, and statutory bodies. Residents' main concerns included waste, crime and anti-social behaviour. Crime was tackled with additional community police, 24-hr CCTV cameras and initiatives such as cross-divisional police surveillance operations and a youth inclusion scheme. The partnership works with the boroughs to co-ordinate and tackle environmental concerns from litter to graffiti. The programme includes physical improvements to highways and walkways, revision of traffic systems around the station, and alterations to commercial streets. On Fonthill Road, a major fashion street, weekday parking was improved and pedestrian areas expanded. This was particularly beneficial for the weekend when parking is limited. A Safer Routes to School programme has consulted schools and pupils, addressing the school journey and helping to guide improvements to surrounding roads, such as pedestrian crossings and clear signs. |
|
Outcomes |
A survey halfway through the programme showed that the number of residents concerned about:
|
|
Noteworthy features |
Breadth of partnerships, and range of measures to achieve wide-ranging quality of life improvements across the area |
|
Further information |
Photo credits: Finsbury Park Partnership
Case Study 2 - Gloucester Safer City
|
Partners |
Safer City Project and Steering Group, Gloucestershire County Council |
|---|---|
|
Region |
South West |
|
Type of scheme |
Road safety engineering and promotion/information |
|
Who benefits? |
All road users but especially vulnerable road users |
|
Sectors |
Transport sector partnership project |
|
Description |
In 1996 Gloucester was the winner of a Safe Town Initiative through which £5 million of government funding was provided in order to undertake 30 years worth of road safety measures between 1996-2000. The project employed a package of measures aimed at reducing casualties: local safety scheme measures were implemented, although on a much larger scale than tried before in the UK; focusing on education, training, publicity and enforcement. |
|
Outcomes |
Between 1996 and 2000:
Overall average speed fell by over 3% in Gloucester by 2001. Residents' responses to specific measures were that speed cameras and the associated signs and posters were rated most positively, followed by cycle lanes, bus lanes and speed humps. |
|
Noteworthy features |
One-off project major investment in road safety engineering which was particularly successful in reducing pedestrian casualties |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: Gloucestershire County Council
Case Study 3 - The UK National Cycle Network
|
Partners |
Over 1,000 local authorities, statutory, voluntary and private sector bodies, co-ordinated by Sustrans |
|---|---|
|
Region |
National (UK) |
|
Type of scheme |
Infrastructure creation, marketing and usage promotion |
|
Who benefits? |
50% of usage by bike, 48% walking, 2% wheelchairs, riding, skating, jogging etc. Traffic-free sections are used by people with restricted mobility and vision, have seats etc, and most are fully wheelchair accessible |
|
Sectors |
Transport, environment, health, leisure and tourism, land use, economic development |
|
Description |
The National Cycle Network (NCN) was originally proposed in 1993, based on examples in other countries. It is two-thirds on-road - low traffic minor rural roads and back streets, and traffic calmed sections of more major roads - and one-third on traffic free paths. By the end of 2003 total NCN route length was 8,200 miles (UK), including some interim sections yet to meet full standards. NCN technical standards are published by Sustrans with DfT approval, and have been adapted for use in numerous countries. Sustrans and others publish maps and guides, there is a dedicated website with interactive mapping, and the NCN media campaign generates MANY media mentions a year - popularising cycling as well as the NCN itself. Sustrans Research and Monitoring Dept measures NCN usage and other travel behaviour. |
|
Outcomes |
In 2003 the NCN carried 126 million trips (2000 = 60 million, 2001 = 74 million, 2002 = 97 million)
|
|
Noteworthy features |
International repute; national status makes cycling appealing to non-cyclists; expansion continues; existing sections continue to show major year-on-year usage growth. |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: J Bewley / Sustrans
Case Study 4 - Camden Boulevard Project
|
Partners |
London Borough of Camden |
|---|---|
|
Region |
London |
|
Type of scheme |
Pavement enhancement and maintenance |
|
Who benefits? |
Pedestrians, residents |
|
Sectors |
Transport, urban environment |
|
Description |
This project aims to provide cleaner streets, better pavements and a more attractive environment. Improvements include:
Works and cleaning regime in each street depend on local circumstances. Streets are selected on the basis of condition, function, demand, the likelihood of public utilities digging up the road, and visual appearance |
|
Outcomes |
Achievements of the Boulevard project include:
Originally planned to run for five years, the scheme is now to be extended indefinitely |
|
Noteworthy features |
A substantial investment in the physical streetscape and street cleaning, to contribute to Camden's aim of encouraging more walking in the borough. |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: London Borough of Camden
Case Study 5 - Durham road user charging scheme
|
Partners |
Durham County Council, National Car Parks and ATG |
|---|---|
|
Region |
North East |
|
Type of scheme |
Zoned access charge |
|
Who benefits? |
Local residents |
|
Sectors |
Transport, environment, land use planning |
|
Description |
Durham City is the historic city whose cathedral and castle are designated as a world heritage site, and which suffers congestion, pollution and road safety impacts of traffic. The Transport Bill of 2000 allowed Durham County Council to implement the country's first road user charging scheme on 1 October 2002. A £2 charge was introduced for Sadler Street and Market Place during the period of peak pedestrian flows - 10.00 am to 4.00 pm, Monday to Saturday. It was complemented by a new bus service and improvements to the paving and street environment. The control system uses CCTV, automatic bollards and modified payment equipment. |
|
Outcomes |
The scheme has been a huge success:
|
|
Noteworthy features |
First congestion charge scheme in England, which defied predictions of failure to be highly successful |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: Durham County Council
Case Study 6 - Traffic Calming, 20 mph Zones in Kingston upon Hull
|
Partners |
Hull City Council, Transportation Department |
|---|---|
|
Region |
Yorkshire and the Humber |
|
Type of scheme |
Self-enforcing traffic calming in 20mph zones |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents, especially in deprived communities, and particularly vulnerable road users including children |
|
Sectors |
Transport, urban environment |
|
Description |
In the mid-1990s Hull City Council launched a programme of implementing 20mph speed limit zones, to tackle casualty rates for child pedestrians and cyclists well above the national average. Hull has a high level of cycle use, with a modal share of 14% for the journey to work. In addition, 51% of households in Hull have no car, well above the national average By summer 2003 a total of over 100 zones covered more than 26% of the city. |
|
Outcomes |
Typical speed reductions in 20mph zones vary according to the types of measures applied.
Across 13 zones installed in 1996/97;
The Council also saw a first year economic rate of return from these schemes of 1,160%. On average, each zone has reduced overall injuries by around 60% and child pedestrian injuries by 75%. Hull's crash reductions saved an estimated £35m, by 2002 |
|
Noteworthy features |
Exceptional |
|
Further information |
Tony Kirby 01482 612 108 |
Photo credit: Hull City Council
Case Study 7 - Chichester cycle parking standards
|
Partners |
Chichester District Council |
|---|---|
|
Region |
South East |
|
Type of scheme |
Cycle parking standards for residential developments, in District Local Plan |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents |
|
Sectors |
Transport, planning, accessibility, communities |
|
Description |
The cycle parking standard was first introduced by Chichester District Council in 1996. It was realised that progress in developing a Chichester cycle network needed to be matched by ensuring new development provided for secure cycle storage, to facilitate everyday cycle use. The 1999 Chichester District Local Plan set a standard of 1 cycle space per unit; the District also published detailed guidance on secure, undercover cycle parking for residential developments. Local Plan Policy states that planning permission will be refused unless developments comply with the cycle parking standard and accommodate the provision of the Chichester cycle network. The recently revised West Sussex County Wide Parking Standards adopted an increased standard of 2 cycle spaces per unit. |
|
Outcomes |
Applications for full planning permission must provide the details of how secure undercover cycle provision is to be achieved, and developers now accept that layouts need to show this, making the standards effectively self-policing. "Increasingly in accessible locations secure cycle parking for all types of residential development is treated with the same importance as car parking. Indeed in the recent revision to the County wide parking standards, the car parking standard has reduced and the cycle parking standard has increased", Jeff Lander, Senior Planner. |
|
Noteworthy features |
Chichester has introduced the high design standards for cycle parking commonplace in continental Europe; their approach has now spread countywide. |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: J Lander / Chichester District Council
Case Study 8 - The City of York road user hierarchy
|
Partners |
York City Council |
|---|---|
|
Region |
Yorkshire and the Humber |
|
Type of scheme |
Policy, informing practice |
|
Who benefits? |
Pedestrians, people with disabilities, cyclists, wider community |
|
Sectors |
Transport, community |
|
Description |
In 1990 York Council introduced a road user hierarchy to guide implementation of their transport policy. This gave priority to road users in the order: 1. Pedestrians 2. people with disabilities 3. cyclists 4. public transport passengers 5. commercial/business vehicles requiring access 6. coach-borne shoppers 7. coach-borne visitors 8. car-borne long stay commuters and visitors. The hierarchy also formed the underlying basis for promoting sustainability through the Local Plan and implementing the Transport Strategy's objectives in full. Specific initiatives within York which illustrate application of the road hierarchy include the Footstreet scheme in the city centre, Park and Ride, city cycle network, and area wide traffic calming schemes including 20 mph zones. |
|
Outcomes |
in 2001 walking and cycling journeys to work were over 29% |
|
Noteworthy features |
The hierarchy reviews and challenges widely held, generally unconscious, bias towards car travellers in transport planning practice |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: P Osborne / Sustrans
Case Study 9 - Trafalgar Square redevelopment
|
Partners |
Transport for London, GLA, Space Syntax |
|---|---|
|
Region |
London |
|
Type of scheme |
Pedestrian focused improvements to iconic public space |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents, visitors, business |
|
Sectors |
Transport, land use, tourism, other business, heritage, architecture and art |
|
Description |
Trafalgar Square, one of the most famous public spaces in the world, had become tatty, isolated and dominated by traffic. The project aimed to:
The redesign included:
|
|
Outcomes |
Trafalgar Square has been very quickly incorporated into Londoners' daily movement patterns:
The scheme has enhanced pedestrian conditions in this part of London and given Trafalgar Square a true sense of public "place". Once avoided by Londoners, the square is now a place of local activity and through movement - a high quality piece of the everyday fabric of London. |
|
Noteworthy features |
Iconic value of Trafalgar Square |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: Space Syntax
Case Study 10 - Oxford Transport Strategy
|
Partners |
Oxfordshire County and Oxford City Councils |
|---|---|
|
Region |
South East |
|
Type of scheme |
A six year programme to reduce congestion, improve the urban environment and quality of life |
|
Who benefits? |
People living and working in the Oxford area |
|
Sectors |
Transport, land use, communities, health |
|
Description |
The central aim of the strategy was to shift private car trips to bus, cycle and foot. In June 1999, central area access restrictions were implemented:
|
|
Outcomes |
Oxford has succeeded in attracting more people into the city, but by more desirable modes:
Despite traffic restrictions in central areas, surrounding streets did not experience a change in traffic levels. |
|
Noteworthy features |
Oxford shows that traffic restraint and promotion of walking, cycling and public transport can increase urban vitality |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: G Lovett-Jones / Sustrans
Case Study 11 - London Congestion Charge
|
Partners |
Transport for London, Mayor of London, Capita |
|---|---|
|
Region |
London |
|
Type of scheme |
Zoned blanket traffic charge to reduce congestion |
|
Who benefits? |
All users, especially charge-zone residents. Benefits in reduced traffic and active travel. |
|
Sectors |
Transport , Treasury |
|
Description |
Central London Congestion Charging Zone: fixed charge of £5.00 between 0.700 - 18.00 Monday to Friday for driving/parking in central London in a motorised vehicle (buses, taxis & motorbikes excepted): clearly indicated by zoning signs/on-road markings and publicity |
|
Outcomes |
Provisional estimates of year-on-year change show:
|
|
Noteworthy features |
Much-improved road conditions create marked incentive to cycle in central London |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: Evans Cycles
Case Study 12 - Shoreditch Triangle, East London
|
Partners |
Transport for London |
|---|---|
|
Region |
London |
|
Type of scheme |
Planning for pedestrians in a major urban highway redevelopment |
|
Who benefits? |
residents |
|
Sectors |
Transport, land use, community |
|
Description |
The Shoreditch triangle scheme involved the reversal of a one way traffic gyratory system. The scheme was funded by Transport for London and their Street Management Division commissioned the pedestrian modelling consultancy Intelligent Space to evaluate the impact that the scheme would have on pedestrian movement. Their advice led to the scheme being modified to increase the number of light controlled crossings, to ensure that crossings were installed on pedestrian desire lines and to widen pavements where pedestrian numbers warranted road space reallocation. |
|
Outcomes |
An evaluation of the scheme by Intelligent Space found:
All parties to the scheme believe that the overall accident risk has been substantially reduced and that, as the roads have become easier to cross, their severance impact has been reduced. |
|
Noteworthy features |
Additional priority accorded to pedestrians during a major road reconstruction project |
|
Further information |
Photo copyright: Intelligent Space Partnership 2004
Case Study 13 - Lyndhurst High Street
|
Partners |
Hampshire County Council |
|---|---|
|
Region |
South East |
|
Type of scheme |
Road Space reallocation |
|
Who benefits? |
Pedestrians, residents |
|
Sectors |
Transport, land use, communities |
|
Description |
Lyndhurst is an attractive town in the New Forest and had become, in traffic terms, the victim of its popularity. The scheme, completed in spring 2001, aimed to:
The scheme involved the provision of wider footways on both sides of the High Street, with improved crossing opportunities, improved pedestrian facilities outside a school and a new pedestrian phase on the Romsey Road arm of the existing signalised junction. The road width was reduced and one of the two lanes removed. |
|
Outcomes |
Monitoring covered both subjective impressions and areas such as traffic speed and air quality:
|
|
Noteworthy features |
Road space reallocation to pedestrians, in the High Street of a major tourist destination. |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: Hampshire County Council
Case Study 14 - Reallocation of road space for cyclists, Hull
|
Partners |
Hull City Council |
|---|---|
|
Region |
Yorkshire and the Humber |
|
Type of scheme |
Reallocation of road space, particularly benefiting cyclists |
|
Who benefits? |
Cyclists and pedestrians |
|
Sectors |
Transport |
|
Description |
The project involved the reallocation of road space from motor vehicles to cyclists, by introducing on-road cycle lanes on a large number of roads in Hull. The total length of new cycle lanes covered initially was 24km, over seven separate routes. These schemes have been in place for over three years, and before and after comparisons of accident statistics and cycle flows have highlighted outstanding results. The schemes are all on major roads, with traffic volumes of around 10,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day and cycle flows between 500 and 900 per day. Generally the schemes involve removal of one traffic lane in each direction and replacing this with marked car parking bays and a cycle lane separated from these by a margin strip. Advanced stop lines have also been introduced at signalled junctions. Building on the success of this work, similar cycle facilities are being introduced along other routes in the city. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Noteworthy features |
Cycle lanes on major roads |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: CTC
Case Study 15 - Halifax historic centre project
|
Partners |
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council |
|---|---|
|
Region |
Yorkshire and the Humber |
|
Type of scheme |
Urban traffic restraint in a historic centre |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents, business |
|
Sectors |
Transport, land use, heritage, business |
|
Description |
The key feature of the Halifax Town Centre Traffic Strategy is a "Zones and Loops" system that allows buses, taxis, delivery vehicles and cycles into through streets but restricts general traffic to five separate "quarters", without access between them. High quality natural materials were used where possible and where appropriate to the setting of adjacent buildings. A traffic regulation order was used to designate the historic town centre as a "restricted zone", so as to avoid a proliferation of signs and markings. Specially authorised non-illuminated, high reflectivity hoop signs have been used throughout. Single face signs such as "no entry", "one way" and "prohibited turn" are only 1.1m high. The restricted zone is also subject to a 20 mph speed limit. The "Market Quarter" became a pedestrianised zone between 9.30 am and 4.00 pm. Entry and exit points are covered by the town centre CCTV and automatic rising bollards, activated by an operator in a control room. The system has eradicated abuse of the restricted entry signs, and made the main shopping area a pleasant traffic free zone. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Noteworthy features |
Care taken to enhance a historic centre through traffic restraint works |
|
Further information |
Photo credit: Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Case Study 16 - Car free housing in Camden
|
Partners |
London Borough of Camden and developers |
|---|---|
|
Region |
London |
|
Type of scheme |
Car free housing development |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents, the wider community |
|
Sectors |
Transport, land use |
|
Description |
Camden is a local authority within Central London highly accessible by public transport. The council has a policy in favour of car free housing, where the developer will sign up to it via a section 106 agreement. Residents of car free housing schemes are not eligible for on street car-parking permits in a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) and not allowed to park in a council owned car park. Disabled drivers are exempted from this. There should be no on-site car parking spaces. Green Dragon House in Covent Garden is one example of 242 schemes the council has agreed, covering some 2,330 dwellings. The original proposal for 29 flats included 9 car-parking spaces but was modified in line with the council's policies. Space that would have been used for car parking was freed to create an internal green space and courtyard for residents to meet and share. Between 1997 and 2003, 58 car free schemes were constructed in line with PPG 3 (housing), PPG 13 (transport) and the Mayor of London's planning and transport strategies. |
|
Outcomes |
Camden estimates that these developments will potentially save 4,660 car trips per day when all are built. The car-free housing schemes help to support local business by encouraging shopping on foot. |
|
Noteworthy features |
|
|
Further information |
Case Study 17 - Northmoor Home Zone, Manchester
|
Partners |
Manchester City Council, Manchester Methodist Housing Association, Northmoor Community Association, Northmoor Urban Arts Project |
|---|---|
|
Region |
North West |
|
Type of scheme |
Home zone, housing regeneration |
|
Who benefits? |
Residents |
|
Sectors |
Transport, urban environment, regeneration, communities |
|
Description |
Northmoor, in south Manchester, has seen 20 years of environmental, economic and social decline. However, it has a strong and diverse community with many people committed to improving their area, and a wide-ranging partnership of public and private agencies and stakeholders. Raising walking and cycling levels is not an explicit aspiration of the home zone, but by redefining the streetscapes to be more pleasant and less traffic dominated, walking and social interaction are encouraged. The project has included:
|
|
Outcomes |
Interim evaluation by Transport Research Laboratory showed a high level of resident satisfaction, by measures such as concerns about speeding traffic, motorists' behaviour towards both adults and children walking, and social interaction. A more complete study is underway.
|
|
Noteworthy features |
High-quality area-wide improvements; aesthetic quality |
|
Further information |
For related documents, pages and internet links, see the column on the right.

